In verses 1-12, the human author recounts the resurrection of Jesus Christ. This is obviously a momentous and victorious event. Luke alone, tells the story of the two disciples walking along the Emmaus Road. If you were going to provide teaching on this subject would the following appear acceptable to you?
- Is the context about frustrated, disillusioned, discouraged disciples?
- Is the point of the passage is to show that Jesus enters our world in order to bring peace?
- Are there 3 main teaching points? Are they:
- A. To find the peace of Christ through His Presence you must "Behold"[1]. That is, you must lean and and look for Him in the midst of your crisis?
- B. To find the peace of Christ you must "take him home"? That is, you have learned that these men were coming from a huge and momentous gathering of people in Jerusalem and are now on their way home. To enjoy the manifestation of His Presence you must look for Him at home in the midst of your circumstance.
- C. To find the peace that Christ gives you must ask Him to come into all the dimensions of your home (i.e. “But they urged him strongly, “Stay with us, for it is nearly evening; the day is almost over.” So he went in to stay with them.” (Luke 24:29, NIV)?
- When you discovered in verse 16 that their eyes were kept from seeing Him, would you assume that this was because of some fault of their own? And respectively when their eyes were opened in their home, was that because they had invited Jesus into all the rooms of their home?
If you agreed with the bullet point 1, then I would certainly agree with you -- to a point. Good start! If you agreed with all the other bullet points, your are in company with a popular Christian speaker and author. My question is this, "Why did the Holy Spirit inspire Luke to record this event?"
- Did God want us to know how to encounter Jesus along life's road?
- Is this a real-life parable that reminds us that along life's road Jesus comes along our sides, points us to the Bible and reveals Himself to us?
- Were the disciples not despondent because they did not understand the Old Testament?
- Did not Jesus need to show them that their entire Scriptures pointed to Him as the Divine fulfillment?
- Did not the disciples sense a deep stirring at His exposition?
- Did this not provide direct eye-witness evidence to the resurrection of Christ?
- Finally, is the point of the story, granted credibility when Luke records: “They got up and returned at once to Jerusalem. There they found the Eleven and those with them, assembled together and saying, “It is true! The Lord has risen and has appeared to Simon.” Then the two told what had happened on the way, and how Jesus was recognized by them when he broke the bread.” (Luke 24:33–35, NIV)
I cannot bring judgment on the speaker eluded to in this blog, nor the countless number that use the Bible this way. The reason is that when I examine my old sermons I used to also allegorize the text. It is a common fault. Some of the great preachers of old did this often. It doesn't make it right.
Brothers and sisters we are not story-tellers. We are to expound and expose the text. The task of the preacher/teacher is clearly enunciated in Nehemiah 8:8 (NIV),
8 They read from the Book of the Law of God, making it clear and giving the meaning so that the people understood what was being read.
Brothers and sisters, give them the meaning of the text, not the meaning you'd like the text to say.
No comments:
Post a Comment